What is the future for job boards and how can recruiters evolve?
There is soon to be a new dawn for the staffing industry but which way will it go?
Job boards, by tradition, provide a platform on which recruiters pay to advertise their vacancies then wait in anticipation for applications to flood through to designated in-boxes. There is nothing particularly deliberate about the service and the reactivity is both its strength and its weakness.
But in the current climate there is little room for limitations, so whilst reduced-cost recruitment solutions will continue to feature in most recruiter’s budgets, technological development dictates that unless job boards embrace more innovative strategies, they could see their status stifled by the sophistication of integrated products such as applicant tracking systems (ATS), CV parsing and the prospects of disintermediation.
Reactivity is history. Witness the rise of integrated proactive engagement
In good times desirable candidates are comfortable, entrenched in their positions and paid well. They are confident. They don’t reach out and share because they see no purpose in it. Conversely, in bad times, everyone feels the need to share, so recruiters are inundated by CVs, most of which are either irrelevant or wholly generic; the latter being as bad as the former during a time when standing out from the crowd is so important.
So what should job boards be doing to ensure their users receive a service that will make them return? What is the future for job boards and how will they tackle the undoubted challenges that lie ahead?
Customer engagement
The recruitment landscape now is about conversations. Web-savvy jobseekers are communicating in language that is natural, open and honest, sometimes even direct; more direct than recruiters might wish them to be. Everything is changing. People are connecting and working together. The Internet is enabling these conversations and there is nothing corporations or recruiters can do to stop it. What they can do though, is embrace it: for joining them and showing innovation is surely the only way to preserve.
Expanding via social media
For some job boards social media has come at just the right time. It provides them with the means of providing information (eg. advertising jobs), building relationships (with clients and candidates) and conducting forums for discussion on how they can improve as an industry. Most importantly of all, however, social media allows job boards to get messages out from their clients to a far wider audience than many other recruitment channels. And these messages are delivered real-time, with accuracy.
Attacking niche markets
If a job board operates in a niche sector the dissemination of this information is even more specific, so even more relevant. A jobseeker looking for marketing jobs in the UK, for example, should be better served by a job board specialising in the marketing field. They return to job boards where the content (and the current age is all about content) is targeted at them. People see tangible value in subscribing to newsletters and feeds, contributing to forums and joining groups if it directly benefits them. Generalist sites, whilst clearly valuable, cannot offer this exclusivity. Their unique visitor stats may be high but they are unable to harvest customer loyalty. Return rates are relatively low.
Sector-specific job boards are also far more likely to be empathetic to their clients. They hear where they are coming from, understanding their frustrations and working to their needs. For niche job board owners it is essential they engrain themselves under the skin of their market. Generalist sites have multiple variables and bigger margins for error. If a niche board fails to engage with its audience it will soon lose its unique identifier and will be dropped in favour of a more meaningful competitor. This is the same for traditional recruitment generalists.
Entwining ‘traditional’ recruitment
The word ‘traditional’ is an interesting one. When does something stop being contemporary? Job boards have been around for ages but are still commonly classed as modern-day recruitment mediums. With the advent and development of social media, however, do job boards now fill a void between traditional recruitment companies and en vogue employment media? Irrespective of the answer it indicates challenging times ahead.
Traditional job boards will offer a low-cost but highly speculative place for employers to advertise their vacancies. Job boards offer recruitment agencies a platform from which to attract talent and develop brand identity. Two separate entities, two different purposes. But whilst the impression is one of mutual exclusivity there should be no reason why the pair cannot develop symbiosis via a job board. By the same token why should recruitment agencies view their competitors as foe? In an age where sharing information and being transparent are the currencies of social engagement, perhaps a job board provides the perfect place to perpetrate a fee-sharing mechanism.
Referral-based recruitment will dominate the employment landscape within two years. In the same period social media will evolve and, with it, opportunities to network will be met by a larger number of experienced social-engagers. These people will be accustomed not only to integrating with social space but using it to find a job and developing their careers. They will also be used to earning fees from recommendations.
Referral-based recruitment
Job boards can be a vehicle for recruiters to attract a better quality of candidate to their vacancy by advertising the role with a cash incentive for recommending someone to it. This serves two purposes: firstly, few recommendations are offered lightly so the recruiter will receive endorsed applications – always a winner. Secondly, recruitment consultants can become referrers, working on vacancies with cash incentives, collecting fees they would not otherwise have been able. There are multiple benefits: recruiters always have new briefs to work on; a recruiter-registered jobseeker has more job options; it reduces the number of speculative calls/applications to the employer/recruiter.
Any niche job board embracing the referral model will add stickiness to its site and through an undoubtedly vast people network can ensure it is the oiled handle of this multi-cogged mechanism. Referral-based recruitment links all the staffing components together and manages to cohesively combine social media, social networking and innovation into one malleable solution.
A merry-go round of conjecture
As employers seek the feasibility of disintermediation, job boards and recruitment consultancies continue to prove their worth. But isn’t the true middleman the traditional recruiter? And if so, where would that leave job boards? Because if the figures are correct more than 50% of job board advertising revenue comes from recruitment agencies. Removing them would mean a huge reliance on direct employer spend, something they are trying to reduce. It is a merry-go-round of conjecture and hypothesis but one thing is for certain, as and when the economy flourishes again it will be the job boards with value-added customer retention schemes that will benefit and profit most.
Around 75% of job boards are owned by the major publishing groups in the UK. Clearly these companies are suffering in the current recession. Classified advertising revenues have dropped by over 17% in the last 12 months; some individual results are much more serious than this. The downturn is hitting advertisers and recruiters hard, attacking job boards from both angles. The short-term cites continued embattlement against cautious employers and cash-strapped recruitment consultancies. So, now more than ever, digital recruitment solution providers should be putting a reciprocal arm around the metaphorical shoulder of their clients, urging them to embrace their new solutions.
Surviving through innovation
When the economy recovers it will be the innovators who thrive. Statics will die. There are too many potential landmines out there for a ‘traditional’ job board to remain reactive. Get with social engagement or get ready to fail.
This article was produced in association with the 12 days of Christmas Jobseeker and Recruiter Guide to Striking it Rich in 2010
Simon Lewis | Editor | Only Marketing Jobs
Related posts:
- Job boards versus recruitment agencies: the gathering storm
- Why are recruiters trying to kill job boards?
- How do recruiters find the best candidates?
- How jobseeker behaviour affects job boards
- Where do jobseekers turn now the market has picked up?
- Only recruiters with a social media strategy will survive
- A pink rhino standing on the platform of Liverpool Street Station would be less conspicuous
- Recruiters preparing for 2010 lift-off
- Why aren’t recruiters socially accepting?
- Future bright for jobseekers, says TV’s recruitment Dragon








One of the dirty, dark secrets of the job board industry is that about 90 percent of the boards generate about 90 percent of their revenues from two dying products: job postings and resume searching.
Although those boards don’t want to admit it even to themselves, posting prices are in a race to zero. As more aggregators like Indeed, SimplyHired, and LinkUp enter the space and scrape more postings from corporate web sites, there’s just not as much of a reason for those employers to pay to post their openings on job boards or anywhere else.
As for resume searching, there are significant problems from the candidate’s side. First, a number of boards have been hacked and resumes used for identity theft reasons. For how long will candidates remain ignorant of this? And when they wake up to the threat, will they continue to post resumes? Second, a number of legitimate organizations have purchased resume searching access but use it to sell their products and services to the candidates rather than present them with job opportunities. If you receive such a call from a penny stock dealer and figure out that they got your name from XYZ Job Board, wouldn’t you complain about that to the thousands of your closest friends through Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and other social media sites? Think of the damage to the brand of the job board. There’s just no good defense against either of these threats. If Google can be hacked by the Chinese, how hard would it be for a job board to be hacked? And what defense is there against a legitimate organization buying access to peddle their wares to your users? Perhaps a legal agreement can be put into place but wouldn’t the damage already be done by the time that agreement comes into play?
Interesting post Simon. I would agree with most of it except to say that recruitment has always been about conversations! It got crappy when conversation made way for ‘clicks’.
I think most definitely the job boards will have to change, but engaging and doing all the stuff like forums, newsletters (Which few read proportionately these days) is all fine, but at the end of the day it matters not if the job board in question does not deliver – i.e. drive placements. When we measured our job boards it was clear they were not actually driving relevant candidates, let alone placements. Very few recruiters appear to be able to measure to this level so ‘applications’ remain the measure.
I think Steven is bang on though – its a race to zero revenues. As it is with recruitment consultancies in the longer term. Print publishers who have moved online are particularly vulnerable.
Also, given the issues with CV databases mentioned above, its only a matter of time before the CV largely disappears as a relevant medium. I have a LinkedIn profile – why do i need a CV? If you want to know everything about me look there, its got everything my CV has and more. And it never ages, assuming im keeping it up to date, which i am.
Results. That’s what matters. All the community and social stuff is great, but if, as a job board, you cant deliver me relevant candidates that i place, its largely a waste of time. At the moment, even the market leading niche job boards struggle are struggling to deliver that.
Hi Simon
I wrote a two paragraph comment, which was deleted during the Captcha process. bummer.
You and Dave Martin are pushing the pre-debate for TruLondon. Excellent comments from Gareth and Steve.
Push to Zero based pricing. For the Americans, this is new territory. UK job boards started with zero based pricing, otherwise known as Free Trials, to gain market share. Once they reached positions of market dominance, usually after the ownership changes, pricing started to move up, in some cases 2-3 times a year. Now we see other challenges to price models for the ‘traditional’ job boards.
A few ideas for the Track next week:
The aggegators can gain market share of jobs – how does the jobseeker define which place to go to? Can the aggregator survive without new pricing/revenue generating models?
Why wouldn’t the candidate join a club, a paid for site where content (jobs) matches what the candidate really wants – and where the candidate is not just one of millions?
Does the candidate really want employers surfing his personal and business profile 24×7 for job purposes? How can the candidate control that access?
Do always on information feeds from Twitter and other media soon lose their shine and get relegated to the waste basket without being read?
Note that these are not necessarily by beliefs, but are points to generate some debate in the Job Boards 2020 debate. Looking forward to seeing you there.
Cheers
Al
Thanks, Alan.
Certainly some great points to consider pre-TRU London. Best get some research done in preparation for my track…
Steve, your points regarding security I cannot answer. I am not aware of any such behaviour in the UK – or at least not in the marketing & comms sector. These people would be the first (behind IT) to get narked!
Your other point – the one about aggregators – is easy to defend: where is the personal touch in that? Right now it’s all about building communities and developing services around these. Job board users want an experience now, not just a place to drop their CV/resume into another empty hole with no guarantee of response.
Re CV/resume searching being a dying revenue stream: People, by definition, are inherently lazy. Whilst LinkedIn et al provide excellent resources for those with inclination/know-how enough to ustilise the talent on show, most won’t want to or, indeed, know how to.
I think multi-sites like Monster/Totaljobs will struggle without evolving because these are the genric platforms to which your sweeping statement alludes.
http://twitter.com/simonlewisomj
[...] But – and this is a very large but – they have to adapt. Much has been said about the evolution of recruitment and most agree than the changes must start here. So aside from the need for better customer [...]
[...] But – and this is a very large but – they have to adapt. Much has been said about the evolution of recruitment and most agree than the changes must start here. So aside from the need for better customer [...]